Sugar

Darius I, Persian Emperor

510 BCE

Over the past few months, our military campaigns have taken us deeper and deeper into the Vedic states which reside in these valleys.  The Indus valley is indeed a beautiful country. Along with this territorial prize, a wonderful discovery has been made. Some of my men have found a plant which produces something which when applied onto food, makes them sweet! It is amazing. We have found honey without the bees. But I shall make sure to keep the secret of this substance carefully kept. It will be exported and sold at a very high price. This way, the Empire can gain great profit from its discovery.

Muslim Caliph

642 CE

Now that G0d has aided us in our fight and helped to conquer the land of Persia, we have found something nice. The Persians have been growing a plant which produces a sweet substance in the form of white powder. This ingredient is used in many foods instead of honey as a sweetener. This is much easier and should be of use for all of those whom Allah has given to us to care for under our rulership. Indeed, it is being produced in all Muslim lands currently.

John Lenone, British Citizen, Resident of London

1099 CE

It has been some months since the pilgrims of the First Crusade have returned victorious from the Holy City of Jerusalem. Along with them they have brought a happily received item from the East. In my walking through the market streets I have been seeing notices for this new product. “Sugar: White Gold of the East.” Everybody prefers it to honey, but since it is expensive,and consumed only as a luxury.

Colombus

1493

We have imported sugar cane to the “New World” and it has been growing amazingly. The tropical climate of these lands has allowed a substantial amount of crops to grow. It seems that here in this primitive side of the world there are at home!

Government Press Release

1990

Sugar is now everywhere. We have lifted the tax on red sugar. We have reached earth. We wonder why we’re here.

 

 

A Day in the Wild

Through the tall grass of the Savannah plains, brown forms can be spotted. A pack of hyenas are on the prowl. Food has eluded them for days, and they are very hungry. Ahead of them a herd of gazelle is grazing. The pack moves closer, with the females in the lead. Suddenly, one leaps forward. All of the gazelle scatter. But the pack flanks one of the backtracking gazelle and bring it down by grabbing it by its hindquarters. Excitedly, the pack begins to feast. After several moments of joyful victory, one the feeding hyenas perks his ears. Danger is approaching. A lion nears. No, not a lion. nOt now, they all think. They tense up because they are afraid. One lion means more lions and lions are bad. But the pack has a tactic: they run about yipping and yapping circling the lion. Hopefully, the lion will flee and never return. Fortunately, it worked this time. With a yelp, the lion runs away, and the pack can continue feasting on their prey in peace.

Wheat, Now Also GMO

Mendel Groner

Professor Sassone

ENG 101

8 December, 2015
On Monday, the 7th of December, Monsanto announced their newest in the line of genetically modified organisms: wheat.

Titled MON 1738, this new category of wheat opens a plethora of options. The company can take out glutens from the wheat, making it much easier to produce gluten-free wheat products. Gluten free bread from before was grown with gluten, but is extracted from the flour. The company can also modify the nutritional content of the food, raising the protein level, or he amount of fiber. Many Americans do not get enough fiber and this could very much supplement one’s diet.

The company has been testing GMO wheat for the past decade and has been approved by the FDA over a decade ago, in 2004, but has refrained from publishing the product. Now, the company says, it is confident that the newly released organism will be widely received by laypeople and experts alike.

There has been obvious resistance to the company’s announcement. Groups of protesters stood outside Monsanto’s headquarters, in Missouri. They desire an “end to chemical poisoning” and “treacherous treating of plants.”

A conspiracy developed in the 80’s, when the company monopolized the genetically modified crop industry that Monsanto is part of a New World Order which will subdue and oporess people’s independency and free will through slowly and sneakily inserting long-acting chemicals into their bodies through their various chemical engineering techniques. No investigation after such claims has been made by any official group. As Monsanto continues to modify more and more staple foods, regular soccer moms are beginning to worry and find validation in these theories.

“I feed it to my children. It’s nutritious and tasty, and they love it,”  says Mary Granderson, mother of three in White Lake, Michigan. “But it worries me that these scientists are putting God knows what into these foods. Who even are they? Are they human? I don’t know. What they’re doing is extraordinary, so they may not be.”

Meanwhile Obama is allowing the country to wallow in confusion. “The FDA has approved the food; there is no reason to worry about extraterrestrial conspiracies,” said a White House spokesman in a press release this morning which was in response to growing public worry.

Although it seems outlandish, it is an illustration of the fact that people don’t know what is in their food and want to have clear answers.

 

Goodbye, Cereal

Dear Cereal,

Hello. How are you? It has been so long since we last saw each other. I used to pull you out of the cabinet at any time throughout the day and you were there to comfort me. I enjoyed so much your sweet sugary delight and wheat substance all awash in cold white milk. It would hit the spot, you know. But alas, the times have changed.

When I awake in the morning, I immediately set about preparing the making of an omelet. For some reason, only warm, hot food could satiate my hunger now. It is strange, but I feel that my innards have shifted and can no longer tolerate that which they could have some time ago.

How have you been faring? In the arms of whom have you been consoled in the event of my absence? Are there those who still eat you, cereal?

It feels so strange talking to you as a stranger; when in fact our bond was (I thought) eternal. It felt that way then. Indeed, the times have changed.

Perhaps its best that we leave things as they are. I’m sorry  for disrupting the silence which hath lain between us.

I wish you the best,

Mendel

Burnt: A Comparative Review

Mendel Groner

Professor Sassone

ENG 101

November 2015

The Passion of the Cuisine

The movie Burnt is about a highly-skilled but terribly tormented man who feels that he is not adding enough to the table. His redemption comes when he realizes that not only does he add to the table, but the table is set because of him. He sees how so many other people need him to sustain their inspiration and continue with their passion and lust for perfect cuisine. When he finds that out, he feels at peace with himself and others. He begin to see the value — nay, necessity — of teamwork in the kitchen, and in all monstrously difficult achievements, including drug addiction.

Bradley Cooper acts as Adam Jones, a harsh, perfectionist, short-tempered chef who has ruined his career due to drug use and destructive behavior. He appears ten years later in the city of London, aiming to open a restaurant which will attain three michelin stars — one of the highest forms of regard a restaurant can achieve. He recruits a team and a sponsor to open his restaurant, Adam Jones: The Langham. Some of his team are acquaintances from Paris, where he worked before his ten year interlude. Some are new fresh faces. One of them is Helene (Sienna Miller), a single mother in whom Adam saw true skill. Over the course of the story, a romance between the two blossoms.

First thing, I’d like to say which was most prominent of the movie’s flaws: too much screen time was invested in the relationship between Adam and Helene. It was unnecessary, because Jones’ liberation came about completely regardless of her presence. It feels like it was just put in the movie because the director thought it would be boring without a significant romance involved, or because the main plot isn’t substantial enough. The character’s distress had not begun with her and she didn’t end it; it began ten years earlier with his original kitchen crew, all under the supervision of master chef John Luke, Adam’s mentor and father figure. Adam has felt like he failed John by not acting ethically. John, who was everything to him, was — in his eyes — disapproving of him. That is not immediately clear in the beginning of the movie. It is gradually unraveled by the plot that that is the source of his current drive to make a new restaurant and keep away from drugs. But, when at a pivotal point in the film, he believes (wrongly) that he has failed at his mission, he relapses. This is showing that up until now, he was only suppressing his inclination to get high, because he still didn’t feel at peace; something was missing in his conscious and heart that was pushing him over the edge. Two events occur which radically change this. One, is that after his relapse, he ends up at the restaurant of his rival, Reece (Matthew Rhys). In seeing Adam’s plight, Reece explains how Adam is truly a much better chef than his peers, and he is the one who kept the spirit going when they were under John Luke. Shortly afterwards, Luke’s daughter, Anne Marie (Lily James) presents Adam with her father set of knives. She says, “He sharpened them before he died. He said, ‘Adam likes everything perfect.’” With this, Adam realizes how much he meant to the person who meant the most to him. He is calm in the kitchen now, and enjoys when the kitchen works as a team rather than in a oppressive frenzy. This entire development is very believable. In any case, one can see how the romance has nothing to do with Adam’s personal journey to redemption.

I have recently read Marcus Sammuelson’s autobiography titled “Yes, Chef.” In it, Sammuelson chronicles his journey from Ethiopia to France to New York and everything in between. One attempts to draw parallels between these two stories of two great chefs, one fictitious, and one real. Such an individual may find it difficult. In certain fundamental ways, the two perhaps share mutual ideas, but in character and behavior and even taste, Adam and Marcus differ. First, let’s start with the passion for the cuisine. In this, they are both equally ambitious. In one of the beginning scenes, Jones remarks “When I was 16, I took all the money I had in savings and spent it on a one-way ticket to Paris” (Burnt). He went to Paris to work in a restaurant for none or very little pay. Marcus early steps follow a similar path. He went from place to place, always with just enough money to get where he was headed.

Work ethic. Both marcus and Adams are hard workers. It seems that that is an inseparable part of being a chef. Too long hours, high pressure. But the two people deal with it in different ways. While Marcus says that no matter how high the pressure was, “I was always working with a sense of urgency, not panic” (189). Marcus mentions how, for years, he would vomit every day because of the pressure. He seemed, however, to deal with it in a very mature and admirable way. Jones, on the other hand, when in the kitchen is the angriest chef in the world. Practically every third word coming out of his mouth while directing the kitchen was a curse word. He is constantly worried and throwing finished dishes at the wall because he doesn’t believe that they’re good enough. He also had a serious drug problem in his former years. It is implied that this was due to the amount of pressure he felt to perform. In fact, at the culmination of the movie, when Adam is redeemed, he is calm and patient as chef.

 One of the emphases in Marcus’ ideas about food is the diversity of it. He wishes to veer from the traditional dishes and french ways of making certain foods, and wants to blend all the amazing flavors of all the different ethnicities which he’s seen and come to know. He wants to make something that has many cultures speaking in it as one. While the movie does not stress this idea about Jones’, it seems that this is what he wants too. There is a montage where he is travelling through different areas of London, tasting different exotic ingredients and foods and asking about them, reminiscent of Marcus’ travels through New York City. He also mentions how he “wants to make people have a culinary orgasm” (Burnt) and goes on to explain how he wants his food to blow people away. From all this it is derived that he too wishes to introduce something new to the history of fine dining, even while still retaining the tradition he had learnt in Paris years ago.

Overall, the tale of Adam Jones is very different from Marcus Samuelson’s story. Adam Jones is a broken man looking to be fixed, while Marcus is a hard worker who wants to prove his worth to himself and his loved ones. But the underlying current of the two is the passion of the cuisine. Like religious zealotry, it cannot be waived as unrelatable and ambitious blindness to outsiders attempting to understand the way of the Crusaders. This tenet is a unifying chain which is perhaps stronger than the distinctive individual plights of these two great chefs. So, in a way, “Yes, Chef” and “Burnt” are two in a series of “the passion of the cuisine”, and in another way, they are two separate stories about two separate quandaries which one can find his or herself trapped in.

 

Works Cited

Burnt. Dir. John Wells. Perf. Bradley Cooper and Sienna Miller. The Weinstein Company, 2015. Film.

Samuelsson, Marcus. Yes, Chef: A Memoir. New York: Random House, 2012. Print.